May 5th, 2023 / µ

Monsters

You will see the term monsters repeatedly if you read my texts. What I mean when I write ‘Monsters’ is the following, a definition I base on my years of experience with gang-stalking, gaslighting, and related harassment.

By monsters, I mean a group of seemingly sociopathic voyeurs who degrade and reduce human beings to objects and entertainment. They seem to revel in humiliating and destroying their human targets, hiding in the shadows, behind desks, and screens. They demonstrate undisguised contempt of the law, freedom, and human dignity, and their statements reveal alarming convictions.

This particular group (my group, if you will) appears to be highly dysfunctional with an extreme echo chamber mentality, defining their own rules, laws, and enemies. Facts are irrelevant. They make up their own reality.

Their apparent motivation is another story.

The group has leaders they talk about with such awe that it is spine-chilling. These leaders appear to be paranoid, unstable, and physically aggressive, with strong narcissistic and sadistic tendencies. Judging by their behavior, they could even suffer from an SMI such as schizophrenia. But that is for professionals to conclude.

There Will Be Monsters

I use the term monsters, which goes back to 2017 when I contacted an old acquaintance to find out who these people were. The term monsters and other unpleasant words were used in our conversation, and stories were told that made me nauseated.

Had I paid serious attention to all I was told, I would have been better prepared for the madness to come, especially for what these monsters did in Paris in the fall of 2019. But I didn’t. Had I paid as much attention then as I later learned to do, I would also know what I know now:

This group always works together as a group; they are nothing as individuals. Their strength lies in numbers, places of employment, and connections. They use two (might be more, but to my knowledge, two) specific setups to gain private individuals’ trust and free access to their homes. They have a vast network, which expands into some worrying circles in Denmark and France and possibly elsewhere, too.

Today I know

Leaving the above monsters aside, what mostly caught my attention in the conversation in 2017 was how social services work in Denmark, a world I knew little about and had had no contact with, apart from housing benefits (Boligsikring) when I was a student.

It was interesting to learn how the so-called welfare system, and especially the SSP*, works in real life, as opposed to the rosy red picture painted by the Danish state. Today, I know a lot more than I would like to. But knowing is always better than not knowing because knowing enables you to choose and choose to tell.

Today, it seems to me that certain parts of the Danish system nurture and fertilize the conviction that human beings are nothing but numbers, entertainment, and meal tickets.

It also seems to me that the very close collaboration in tiny Denmark between the social services, schools, and police forces, where the same people work together year after year, establish close relationships, possibly even private ones, and information and, perchance, misinformation flow freely, can endanger the freedom and fundamental civil rights of Danish citizens as well as other individuals residing in Denmark and reinforce the above mentality and certain people’s assumption that violating the rights, freedom, and dignity of Danish citizens and other individuals living in Denmark is their prerogative and privilege.

Lesson Learned

Today, I know that Denmark has a truly sinister and disturbing side to it: systems of social control, corruption, favors, exploitation, and inequality where monsters can do whatever they want and get away with it because they are part of a system that in all its self-glorification relies upon trust and uncontested words instead of proof, fact-checking, and consequences.

That is, the system seemingly implicitly trusts the words of the system’s employees (state, region, municipality).

To my knowledge and my experience, this behavior and attitude mean that any public employee in Denmark can tell any lie about any person residing in Denmark, and nothing will happen to the liar. The person being slandered may not even know that the lie has been told or written, as in the situation with contact reports. If you gain access to lies about yourself – as I have managed in a few situations – and object to these, you will either be ignored or things will get even worse, in my personal experience.
There are consequences when one questions or rebels against the new nobility!

Fact Box:

SSP stands for Social Services, School, and Police. It is, in effect, a system of surveillance and control. To begin with, it was a collaboration between these three institutions - most likely in violation of the Danish constitution – to help young people under the age of 18.

However, today, it has perverted into a state within the state, and these SSP groups have the right even to violate the lives and privacy of people over the age of 18!

To my knowledge, and now in my experience, specific people within these groups are so extreme, so insane, so out of touch with reality, that they believe themselves to have the right to surveil, exploit, violate, control, and destroy any Danish citizen or person residing in Denmark at will! And their actions, their crimes, have never, to my knowledge, been investigated by the police, that is, their colleagues.

Becoming aware of this and how people involved in these groups see human beings as their private property, as entertainment and animals with no rights, whom they can do to whatever they want, has been, I lack words here, but in lack of better wording, shocking!

Revealing the monsters who have stolen my life will also mean exposing specific Danish cities and SSP structures and how they can function as nepotistic and possibly criminal networks within the public sector, how people in SSP networks are protected by their desks, connections, and titles, and how a specific group, The Monsters, are closely linked to particular social control networks and criminal groups in Denmark and France.

Thanks for reading! I hope you found it valuable and worth your time! Until next time, remember to get your facts straight and that whatever good times you have will never come back as bad times,

µ

Kontaktrapporter

(Contact Reports)

Writing a report after a meeting, conference, phone call, or any kind of contact you have had with one or more individuals is standard. There’s nothing wrong with that; that’s standard procedure for most professionals.

However, the kind of reports I am talking about, contact reports (in Danish: Kontaktrapport), are those written by individual Danish public employees about a person, a citizen or non-citizen resident of Denmark they met with – one one-on-one meeting, phone call, and so on – that are not automatically accessible to the person or persons discussed and defined.

When it first became known to me that these reports existed, it was through some stories about the social services system and the extreme behavior of certain case workers. And I understood that it is the prerogative of Danish public employees to write such uncontested and de facto secret reports; secret as in kept a secret from the person they describe and discuss.

But I admit it wasn’t until I fell upon reports written about myself by police officers that I began to think seriously about this and understood that (to my knowledge) any public employee I had come into contact with had the right to write such a subjective and non-contested report about me.

I asked around to see if it was just me who was out of the loop, and that it was common knowledge this system of reporting and public employees evaluating and assessing, e.g., the personality, lifestyle, and mental state of the people they had had a conversation with. No, it was not common knowledge that an encounter with a public employee could give birth to such a report. The people I asked did not even know that such reports existed.

By now, it has become evident to me that the Danish state prefers to keep what public servants write in these reports about Danish citizens hidden from the citizens.

That is not as surprising as it sounds, though. It is more or less standard in Denmark – if it can be hidden, it will be hidden. My experience is that obtaining any kind of information from the Danish state, including information about yourself, is a challenging process, often resulting in a stalling process that, if you are persistent and don’t back down, results in them handing you a tiny slice of the cake and indirectly telling you:

That’s it! Now shut up!

I have gotten my hands on a few of these (libelous) contact reports written about me, and I know of extreme reports written about welfare clients by social service employees that are so shocking that I lack the words to describe my repulsion.

Overall, I will say that the contact reports I have read reveal a problem of such magnitude that I believe that it undermines the constitutional state. This will be discussed later on.